The next Valencia Colloquium will join forces with the III Blasco Disputatio. As usual, the Colloquium will take place on Friday morning, but with a special time and venue: from 10am to 13:30am at the Col•legi Major Rector Peset (Plaça del Forn de Sant Nicolau, 4). More precisely, the schedule is the following:
10-10:45 Manuel García-Carpintero (Universitat de Barcelona): Singular reference in fictional discourse
10:45-11 Coffee Break
11:00-11:45 Stacie Friend (Birkbeck, University of London): Reference and Representation in Fiction
12-12:15 Replies (by M. García-Caprintero and S. Friend)
The Blasco Disputatio is a yearly workshop designed to promote the discussion on topics in epistemology, metaphysics, the philosophy of mind and the philosophy of language. This year the workshop is on Singular Terms in Fiction. Even though the Colloquium is restricted to Friday morning, there will be other interesting talks on Thursday 19th and Friday 20th (see the programme). We strongly encourage you to attend this exciting event!
Next Friday, October 6th, Carlos Moya will be presenting “Perplejidades e inquietudes sobre la responsabilidad moral y el libre albedrío”. The presentation will take place at the seminar room of the Philosophy Teaching Unit (ground floor, F11), at the Faculty of Philosophy and Education Sciences of the University of Valencia, from 11:30 to 13:30. Find the abstract here.
David Teira will present “Does replication help with experimental biases in clinical trials?”,next Friday, September 22th, at 11:30. The presentation will take place at theseminar room of the Philosophy Teaching Unit (ground floor, F11), at the Faculty of Philosophy and Educational Sciences of the University of Valencia.
Here is the abstract of the presentation:
This is an analysis of the role of replicability in correcting biases in the design and conduct of clinical trials. We take as biases those confounding factors that a community of experimenters acknowledges and for which there are agreed debiasing methods. When these methods are implemented in a trial, we will speak of unintended biases, if they occur. Replication helps in detecting and correcting them. Intended biases occur when the relevant debiasing method is not implemented. Their effect may be stable and replication, on its own, will not detect them. Interested outcomes are treatment variables that not every stakeholder considers clinically relevant. Again, they may be perfectly replicable. Intended biases, unintended biases and interested outcomes are often conflated in the so-called replicability crisis: our analysis shows that fostering replicability, on its own, will not sort out the crisis.
This site is maintained by a group of researchers from the University of Valencia working within the broad tradition of analytic philosophy. Our aim is to promote the work of several philosophers and groups whose research focuses on a number of philosophical fields, such as ethics, philosophy of action, philosophy of language and the many topics of philosophy of science. Here you will find information about our research groups and our activities, such as the Valencia Colloquium in Philosophy and the Blasco Disputatio.
Welcome to Valencia Philosophy Lab
Our aim is to promote the Valencia Colloquium in Philosophy and other research activities encompassing a broad range of topics from the perspective of the analytic tradition in philosophy.
Abstract: What goes on when one person forgives another? In this paper I argue for The Alteration Thesis. According to the Alteration Thesis, forgiveness is an exercise of a normative power, and hence it is an essential[...]
Abstract: Les creences porten a l’acció i en l’acció es manifesten. No actuem (sempre) segons allò que sabem, sinó merament segons allò que creiem. D’altra banda, segons allò que creiem així farem i, en la[...]